Explore the theme of Duality in ‘The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde’ Essay

First published in 1886, ‘The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde’ was an immediate success and one of author Robert Louis Stevenson’s bestselling novels. It is a classic example of Gothic fiction and even though it may be seen as just a horror story, with accounts of violent murders and a disturbing, scientific experiment gone wrong, the book also explains the suppression of the Victorian society. Furthermore, Stevenson brought out further ideas of human psychology during the Victorian times, as the story explores the theme of duality in human nature; the idea that every person has two sides to themselves – a nicer, kind side which can also be seen as ‘artificial’ as it is displayed in social situations, whereas the sinister, darker side of man is unsuspected and hidden. This will be my main focus in the essay, analysing how Stevenson uses this theme of dual nature in his novel. ‘The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde’ has another unusual twist because, after all the horrendous acts that have been committed and the unpredictable behaviour of the characters, it is only in the last chapter that the plot and the true dual nature of Henry Jekyll are revealed to the reader, through a letter that Jekyll leaves. It is in this letter that he describes in detail his theory of good and evil in one body, his scientific interests and what made him want to create such a potion that could separate his personality. Jekyll starts with an explanation of his family background and tells us how he was born to a â€Å"large fortune, endowed besides with excellent parts† showing that he had the best start in life and, even from an early age, it was clear that he had every chance of being successful in the future. This leads to the expectations of him, coming from a wealthy family with a high status in the Victorian times – Jekyll had to do what was expected of him and become a doctor or a lawyer, which he did achieve. He has all the money, respect and status and from the outside, Jekyll seems to have the perfect Victorian gentleman’s lifestyle. He lives up to this perfect life, putting on a show of having an honest nature, and maintaining good manners and respectable behaviour in public – â€Å"†¦he was now no less distinguished for religion. He was busy, he was much in the open air, he did good.† However Jekyll lives a double life, there’s more to him than the side that he displays in public. As much as he wants to be a good person and keep up his appearance, Jekyll finds it difficult to cover up his sinful side, where he feels the needs to commit bad deeds such as visiting prostitutes and going out drinking. It doesn’t clearly state what exactly it is that Jekyll wants, so it is left to the reader’s imagination. Even though it might not seem as bad to us in today’s society to drink and have sexual urges, it came across as ‘taboo’ in the Victorian times so we assume that it was in the immoral side of Jekyll’s nature to go round getting drunk and having sex. Furthermore if you had a higher status, it would be required of you to suppress these feelings so you wouldn’t be shunned upon for acting on your desires. Unfortunately it becomes more and more challenging each day for Jekyll to go on living with the two different sides within him, he â€Å"conceals his pleasures† for the reason that the position he has earned in society and his reputation, depend on it. Jekyll learns that â€Å"man is not truly one, but truly two†. Based on this theory, Jekyll researches and develops a potion that could allow him to try and split the two parts of him, so he can have two separate identities; one with a good nature and the other where he can give in to his darker desires without facing the consequences. After finally finding the right chemicals and substances, Jekyll puts together the potion and takes a sip, aware that he could be risking his life. As soon as he has taken the potion he begins to experience agonizing pains, the symptoms of which include â€Å"a grinding in the bones and deadly nausea†. However, all these pains disappear after a while and Jekyll starts to feel new, strange feelings he hasn’t felt before which he finds â€Å"incredibly sweet†. He sees â€Å"disordered sensual images† in his head and he instantly feels younger, stronger and happier. It seems as if, in a way, Jekyll has created a body to go with and represent his hidden personality and with just a gulp of the potion he has the power to transform himself into this other person, Mr Edward Hyde, whenever he wants. He realises that he now has an â€Å"unknown but not an innocent freedom of the soul† and so he knows straight away that he can let out all the feelings he has k ept repressed for so long, that he can carry out the acts he has always desired, and commit sins without feeling that he guilt that he would have, as Jekyll. At first it seems as if the discovery of this potion was to Jekyll’s advantage; now he has another identity which allows him to do everything he has dreamed of doing, without paying the consequences. However Jekyll kept his darker side restrained for such a long period of time, and now that he can release himself through another body, the feelings that were repressed are now so strong that they become violent and lead to him causing harm to the society. Edward Hyde only appears briefly throughout the novel, and is first introduced through one of the other characters, Mr Enfield, telling the story of how he witnessed Hyde carelessly trampling all over a young for no apparent reason, late at night; this is what makes Hyde automatically come across as evil from the beginning of the story, to the readers. Robert Louis Stevenson also leaves what it is that Hyde gets up to, to the readers imagination too, but Hyde’s major appearance in the novel is when he brutally kills an old man known as Sir Danvers Carew (the local MP) using a stick and like the trampling of the young girl incident, without a motive. As Sir Danvers Carew is described as â€Å"an aged and beautiful gentleman† who is said to have â€Å"bowed and accosted Hyde with a very pretty manner of politeness†, it is oblivious to us what exactly it was that provoked Hyde to engage in such a horrifying murder. The fact that Hyde breaks out in a â€Å"great flame of anger† and trampled on Sir Danvers until his bones were â€Å"audibly shattered† and also that the heavy wooden cane he used to beat Sir Danvers with was broken in half, indicates the intensity of Hyde’s anger and how malicious the murder really was. The murder case brings out the cruelty in Hyde, and furthermore, represents the savagery within him and how animal like his nature is – how could a person kill another man so viciously, without even feeling the slightest bit of remorse? Hyde’s fury is described as â€Å"apelike† and the fact that his behaviour is linked to him being a beast or a savage animal all comes down once again, to the repression of Jekyll’s feelings – the monster in him comes out roaring. Once Jekyll transforms back into himself he realises just how awful the murder he committed as Hyde is and this leaves him feeling shocked and also worried about the amount of trouble he will be in, so therefore vows to never take the potion again. On the other hand, Hyde makes it impossible for Jekyll to stick to this vow. This is for the reason that Hyde loathes Jekyll; he wants to be this free, untamed personality all the time and so the power that he has over Jekyll grows more and more until Jekyll finds himself unwillingly transforming into Hyde at random times, without even needing to drink the potion. Jekyll becomes helpless and acknowledges that the only way he will ever be able to get rid of Hyde is by ending his own life. Throughout the novel, R.L. Stevenson uses language which portrays both Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde as two very different characters, both of their contrasting descriptions suggest that they are nothing alike and that they have nothing in common – they are both opposites. If it wasn’t for Jekyll’s will which shows us both characters are well acquainted, we would think that they have nothing to do with each other. As soon as Hyde is just vaguely mentioned in the novel, the other characters and the narrative descriptions use negative language directly towards him. They act as if they’ve been horrifically shocked by his facial features which makes the reader picture him as a repulsive looking creature, especially as he is said to be â€Å"pale and dwarfish† and that he â€Å"gave an impression of deformity without any nameable malformation†. The text even indicates that there is something so wrong with Hyde’s physical appearance that he can scare away the other characters in the book by simply looking at them – â€Å"but gave me one look, so ugly that it brought out the sweat on me like running.† Also Hyde is often related to having animal-like characteristics and behaviour, linking to Darwin’s theory of evolution which was newly introduced in the Victorian times around the same period the story was set. The idea that humans had evolved from animals extremely shocked the Victorians. On one hand it was difficult for them to get their heads around the fact that humans descended from apes and that the human mind could be composed of animal element, since they strongly believed that God was the creator of the world and all the species, contradicting Darwin’s theory which challenged creation stories and religious beliefs. On the other hand it was highly disturbing for the Victorians to acknowledge that they too had descended from apes, when they thought that every individual had been uniquely made by God. It must have been especially frightening, for a Victorian to read The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and discover the beastlike aspects of Hyde which suggest that he is stuck in the phase of evolving from an ape into a human. This also reflects back to Jekyll creating the potion – by attempting to split his personality, he was tampering with God’s creation and going beyond the limits as a human. Jekyll goes too far with his experiments, resulting in disasters. The two different areas in London that Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde are associated with also differentiate from each other and reflect their contrasting personalities. Jekyll lives in Cavendish Square, a very wealthy area in the west end of London, symbolising the high status of the career that Jekyll has – he’s a d octor who is wealthy and respectable. Alternatively Hyde comes from Soho; one of the poorest areas in London with a bad reputation, at the time the story was set. It is described as a â€Å"dismal quarter† with â€Å"muddy ways† and â€Å"slatternly passengers† and was home to the disreputable and indecent places in the Victorian times, such as brothels and music halls – there was a â€Å"dingy street, a gin palace, a low French eating house, a shop for the retail of penny numbers† which indicates the low wealth of Soho. The â€Å"dingy streets† and cheapness of Soho makes the reader imagine dirty and grubby roads in comparison to those of Cavendish Square which are â€Å"as clean as a ball-room floor†. The quote â€Å"many ragged children huddled in the doorways† describes the poverty-stricken and deprived state of this area. Naturally this poorer area would have a higher crime rate than other areas in London, which is why it was where one might go to make dodgy deals, or where a person would be most likely to bump into criminals and beggars. Soho particularly reflects Hyde’s personality and the reader can see exactly why he would fit in so well in such a place, as he can be defined as a criminal in many occasions of the story. The theme of duality throughout the story is also reflected in other characters of the story and the setting too, as well as just Jekyll and Hyde. There are many cases where some of the characters are shown to be hypocrites and even lead double lives. For example, the policeman investigating the Carew murder case â€Å"lit up with professional ambition† when he comes to realise that it is the local MP whose death he is in looking into, and the advantages of this case for his career regardless of how brutally Sir Danvers Carew was killed. This hypocritical behaviour of the policeman clearly shows the reader his selfishness and that he cares more about what good it would do him to deal with something that would â€Å"make a deal of noise† than exposing a murderer. He knows that it would lead to his personal recognition within the community, as Sir Danvers was a gentleman who was highly looked up to so he seizes the chance. In addition to this Sir Danvers was said to be walking the street alone, late at night around the time of his murder so despite the fact that he appears to be so polite and innocent, is there no chance that he could have had another unsuspected side to him, too? Another example of a hypocrite would be the old woman at Hyde’s house, who is even said to have an â€Å"evil face, smoothed by hypocrisy†. On the hearing of Hyde being in trouble with the police, â€Å"a flash of odious joy appeared upon the woman’s face† meaning that it is to her satisfaction to hear about her master’s sins and involvement in crime when it’s her job to still be loyal and trustworthy towards him, regardless of any crime he has committed. Although there’s nothing more than a couple of sentences to these two little revelations in the novel, they reveal to the reader the true and double natures of people who we would expect better from. Even Jekyll’s house symbolises duality – firstly there are two entrances, a front door used by Jekyll and the back door used by Hyde, supporting that there are two sides to everything, and also that it seems less obvious to the reader that they are both the same person. The front section of the house consists of Jekyll’s general living space, and he commonly uses this area to throw dinner parties and gatherings. The hall is â€Å"warmed by a bright, open fire and furnished with costly cabinets of oak† which gives the impression of being very welcoming and comforting. Jekyll’s elegant home echoes a â€Å"great air of wealth and comfort† representing the character he acts as in public. The rear door which Hyde enters and leaves from is â€Å"blistered and distained† and leads to Jekyll’s laboratory and private room where Hyde is usually seen. The back rooms of the house don’t share the elegant interior and hospitable atmosphere of the front rooms making them seem as if they are not connected to each other. The laboratory is a â€Å"sinister block of building† with no windows which makes it significantly dark and depressing as there is no natural light coming in to the room. The negative language used links Hyde to the back section of the building and reflects his personality. We have already acknowledged that the theme of duality is related to the suppression of the Victorian society, as we know Jekyll’s double nature exists due to hiding his feelings. It was common for Victorians, gentlemen in particular, to suppress their feelings as status depended on reputation, making it difficult for them to give into pleasures that they des ire. An example of this is shown in Mr Utterson the lawyer, who solves the truth behind the story of Jekyll & Hyde. As his profession has a high status, he obviously has to live up to the good reputation he has – the quote â€Å"and though he enjoyed the theatre, had not crossed the doors of one for twenty years† shows that he refrains from doing the things he would like to, simply concealing his emotions. Likewise, Mr Enfield subtly implies that he is also hiding something when he quotes â€Å"I was coming home from some place at the end of the world, about three o’clock of a black winter morning† – as he doesn’t give any details about where he was and he was out so late, perhaps he was committing some type of sin, and giving into his suppression. The structure of the book continues to reflect the predominant theme of duality as it has a non linear narrative with a number of characters narrating the different chapters of the story. This suggests that there are more than two ways of looking at something, as the reader gets to see the same event through the eyes of different people and learn about their varying viewpoints, which backs up the author’s theory that â€Å"man is not truly one, but truly two†. Although it is effective for us to be told the story from multiple perspectives, since it creates more of a mysterious tone throughout the novel and sets the suspense, it is quite biased as the accounts we are told from the different characters are based on their individual emotions and opinions regarding the events. I believe that Stevenson succeeds in getting his belief of dual nature in humans, across to the readers throughout the novel as the overall message of the book is that the human personality can be split into several parts. There is no one person who is all pure, or all evil, each and every one of us has different personalities and people living within ourselves. At one point in life, all humans will have put on a faà §ade, pretending to be a different person in public whilst their true emotions remain hidden inside. Stevenson explores this concept in depth, and the conclusion is that there will never be just one way of looking at something; there is never just one side to a story.

Getting a Pre-Nuptial Agreement

Marriage is one of every one’s dreams, at least majority do. It is the union of two lives and two souls. Sometimes it is by choice, and sometimes it is a choice others make for you. Regardless of the nature of the union, whether it was desired for or not, a marriage is deemed forever unless legal matters step in and declare itself above all else.It is unfortunate that there are marriages that end badly. Some get pay in money or with their lives. Others get hurt emotionally or physically. No matter how dreamy a person could get with the idea of marriage and a married life, it is still important to get a Prenuptial Agreement before anything else is settled and deemed final. Every couple must have a Prenuptial Agreement.Getting a prenuptial agreement does not mean that an end to the relationship is anticipated. Instead, the mindset is to get some ground rules. It is not being too cautious.It is an assurance that human dignity can never be taken no matter what happens. With this i n mind, four articles were used to explore the very idea. One of them suggested that there will always be expectations, some cannot be met.The second is that money will always be talked about regardless of being forced to remain below a certain line. The third there will be sacrifices, not all should have been made. Lastly, it is to keep a certain degree of freedom despite these sacrifices.According to Polly Sherman’s article entitled â€Å"Great Expectations†, the initial definition of marriage was for the sake of the kids and appearances. The society can destroy a person’s reputation without having all the facts.But with only these for their reasons to maintain a married life, there came more divorces than people would have found comfort in. There were more unhappy unions as well. But the article also shared that people today define marriage as the ideal union.It will be through finding the appropriate partner, who will understand everything about you and acce pt all strengths and flaws. It will be about love. It would encompass a match made through the soul.However, regardless of the definition, expectations are still made. The package is simply bigger today. Sadly, not all expectation can be met. No matter how strong the will of a person might be, there will always be times when that cannot be met.As the old clichà © goes, you cannot have everything. People might expect, but sometimes it is better to expect nothing at all. A prenuptial agreement would help set those expectations in the event that something wrong comes along the way.The second article is by Deborah Siegel. Her article â€Å"The New Trophy Wife† suggested that despite putting money an issue on the side, it gets to be the center of attention in the end. In her article, she used actual couples to illustrate her point.It was written couples who earned almost the same amount had less problems in comparison to the couple where one earned more. This is highlighted furth er when the woman earns more.This scenario pointed that regardless of how ideal the relationship is, there will always be problems. It is not saying that it is inevitable to have problems where money is concerned. However, when one of a pair is gaining more, insecurities are pinched at.This will instigate all other emotions, including jealousy and even hate. The love they built might be overpowered by these negative emotions. More importantly, when it comes to money, personal assets might be misplaced or even taken away. A prenuptial agreement will secure that and a better future if the relationship becomes less sustainable.In contrast to the other articles, Barbara Kantrowitz and Pat Wingert shared in â€Å"The Science of a Good Marriage† that the ideal image of a union, with that of a soul mate, is a mere myth. Effort should be exerted. Sacrifices will have to be made.They made a study, through the nature of what he and his current wife do for a living, to determine these d ifferent realities. By having these different natures, they will be able to define and set criteria of what a good marriage should be like. They called it a science because they used a well thought research method to retrieve these information.The article focused on getting the picture that seems to be left unsaid before a marriage is affirmed by a ceremony. As illustrated in the article, marriage is not merely the simply combination of the yin and yang. That might be a beautiful dream but realities are more important.A prenuptial agreement may assist in minimizing the dilemma with regards to how much sacrifices are made. Sacrifices are a part of life. One will have to sacrifice to achieve something even greater. But in certain marriages, there are sacrifices that are uncalled for. Those are situations where none is achieved, much less returned.  Lastly, the story by William Faulkner â€Å"A Rose for Emily† is a about a woman who stood from everyone else in the community. T he members of society suspected so much of her. They judged and scrutinized her very existence, even until that last day of her life.But despite what other people thought of her, she acted the way she would have thought appropriate. It might not be with the approval of everyone else, but she does not need the approval of others to make what she does worth doing and her life worth living.In line with this, no matter what happens, a life partner should let their other half be themselves without judgmental eyes. This might be a more romantic aspect of a getting a prenuptial agreement, but this does not even have to be the legal kind.It should be a silent agreement between the lovers that they should let each other be as themselves. Otherwise, if they try to change the other too much, he or she would not be the same person they love and chose to begin with. It would be just their ideals and not who those people really are.In conclusion, a prenuptial agreement is very important. It will set expectations for either party. It will stand in opposition to financial issues if it gets in the way of the progress in their relationship. It will establish how much either constituent should sacrifice to make the relationship work through the years. Finally, the agreement is to allow those involved to be themselves without any form of restraint or coercions.These points cover the basic reasons as to why it is important to attain a prenuptial agreement before there will be any signing of documents or walking down aisle. Having one at hand does not mean that the couple anticipates what is going to happen to their marriage.No one can actually tell the future unless they are the ones to make for themselves. Other people cannot tell them the flow they will have to follow unless for their own beliefs and choices.Marriage is the ideal union of lives and souls. But it is not the perfect relationship one can live by. Problems will always rise from different causes. Allowing the relatio nship to fail and break will be by the hands of the couple themselves. It will depend not only on their feelings but also on their principles.If what they want is clear to them, and a happy married life is what they are after, a prenuptial agreement will assist them in achieving that goal. It is not a means to an end. Instead, it is a guide to make things better regardless of what happens through it.

Read the requirement and powerpoint first, then write the essay

Read the requirement and powerpoint first, then write the - Essay Example In the negotiations, it is vital that the three elements including knowledge, interpersonal skills and attitude are present in the negotiating parties because this tends to affect the ultimate end result of the cooperation. In this case, the main part in negotiatin form the Setlek company was played by the Chief financial officer of the pharmaceutical company. The CFO controlled the entire negotiation by using knowledge as power. Majority of the points that arose in the negotiation were on the side on the setlek company. The CFO had solid points that made it easier for him to control the negotiation. For the CFO of Setek company, the major factor that affect his negotiation is the idea that if he is navle to sell the company to Biopharm within this year, the selling value for the company would decline rapidly and Setlek would have to face great loss. By selling the company at $7 million at this year, Setlek would then have to focus its attention on selling the Petrochek patent, to Bi opharm as well. So the fact that Setlek needs to sell not only the plant but also the Petrochek patent forces the CFO to take each step carefully. The probability of selling the patent to Elfand Exxon is very low since neither of the two companies are majorly interested in the patent to pay $5 or more for it. If biopharm agrees to buy the plant for $7 million and the patent for $4 million, Setlek would have sufficient money to divert its attention to developing in the conventional pharmaceuticals. It is thus vital that any negotiating team pay great attention to the factor that brings an advantage to the company not only in the long run but also an advantage at the present. In this case, since the company has bought the company for $12 million and now is negotiating selling it at $7 million final shows that the company needs an immediate advantage so that it can establish on its current strategy. The context of the current negotiating case is in fact not that

Industrial Relations Integrated Project (Human resource) Essay

Industrial Relations Integrated Project (Human resource) - Essay Example The report then gives recommendations that could be applied to improve industrial relations especially in the context of employee disciplinary policies and termination of employee services. Danway electrical and mechanical engineering has been in the engineering industry since 1976, the firm provides engineering services in a variety of professional in engineering, industrial and construction sectors. The company offers a variety of engineering services ranging from mechanical, electrical and instrumentation works. The company also offers quality services in infrastructure construction, maintenance and upgrade, and is involved in projects from designing to completion of quality structures (Danway, n.d). Danway guarantees the delivery of high quality services to client, a mission they have achieved enabled by a highly skilled staff, effective project management that ensures timely completion of projects while still ensuring the safety during and after the project. Projects are very la bor intensive; require the coordination of professional engineers, architects, project managers, skilled and semiskilled workers participating in planning and erection of projects. There is need for precision in attending to the projects and constructions since errors in this field would be fatal for users of any faulty facilities put up. To achieve this there are a set of policies and procedures set up to monitor activities within the company. Usually the adherence to these regulations is closely monitored by operations manager and the human resource manager. Importance of discipline procedures Operations in every organization are governed by a set of guidelines and policies to ensure efficient delivery of quality products and services. Jex and Britt (2008), show the need to establish a code of conduct which creates a favorable environment for performance of duties for both the employee and the employer. The employer through the coordination of the human resource manager and the op erations manager has the responsibility of constant and timely communication with their employees. It is essential to keep them updated on their responsibilities, for motivation and correction whenever duties are not well attended. It is the responsibility of every manager to ensure that both the employer and the employee understand the rules on which the organization runs. Ambiguous rules are often subject to misinterpretations and can cause a great difference between the parties involved (Jex and Britt 2008). To achieve this every organization has a set of disciplinary policies which guide operations of human resources in factory operations. These policies are well communicated by the human resource management (Bjorkman and Stahl 2006). It is important for every employer to establish good disciplinary policies for their organization. These are meant to ensure efficiency in operations while still protecting the rights of the employee. With the knowledge of their duties and proper c ode of conduct expected from them, employees are expected to responsibly perform duties and deliver in their positions with precision to ensure the achievement of the organization’s mission and vision. According to Bates (2002), a good disciplinary

Operations Management Case Analysis Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Operations Management Case Analysis - Term Paper Example The revised approach as devised by Master Tag is beneficial, since it will entail supplying the labels directly to the plant growers. The labels will be supplied in two batches, with one batch supplied earlier, and the second batch supplied later, depending on the amount of produce that the plant growers will have obtained during any particular season (Foster, 697). This being the case, the revised plan will ensure that Master Tag does not produce labels beyond the requirements of the plants growers at any particular season, since the production will be based on the quantity of produce that the plants growers have produced in that season. The plan is also beneficial because, the production of the labels will be occurring in two batches, ensuring that the plant growers will not experience any shortages of the labels, since they will already be having the first batch, as they wait for the second batch to be delivered (Foster, 697). This improves the system of communication between the company and the users of the labels, ensuring that the company produces the exact amount of labels, which the plant growers will need to use. This way, the revised plan will have guarded against over or under production of the labels, ensuring that the customers are fully satisfied. 2. Mster Tag has not yet decided to implement this plan. List the pros and cons you think should be considered. The pros that should be considered while introducing the plan include: Direct produce to consumer interaction This is the first benefit that this revised plan will introduce, since it will pave way for the producer, in this case Master Tag, to interact directly with the consumers, who in this case are the plant growers. The improved producer to consumer relationship is a vital concept of business, since it establishes an avenue through which the producer and the consumer will address all the issue involving their business, thus improve their understanding, while also fostering loyalty and goodw ill (Sharp, 43). Direct producer to consumer relationships also fosters the process of innovation, since the producer will understand better the needs of the consumers, and therefore tailor made their products towards directly satisfying the unique needs of the consumers (Sharp, 45). This is contrary to the earlier plan, where the labels were first supplied to the seed companies, who in turn supplied them to the consumers. This is because, the producer would only depend on the information from the seed companies, thus may fail to meet the unique needs of each and every of the consumers, owing to the fact that the seed companies would order universal labels, while different plant growers would want the labels specifically made for them. Reduced price possibilities Secondly, the revised plan is advantageous to the company and to the plant growers, since it would enable a reduction in the price of the labels, now that they are delivered directly from the producer to the consumer, witho ut being added the costs of the intermediary, in this case, the seed companies (Foster, 698). This plan is a double gain, since it allows the producer to sell directly to the consumer without the inconveniencies of

Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 119

Assignment Example Malachai started the business when he was in college and now he owns and manages the small service-oriented business by providing price quotes, hiring student painters, purchasing supplies, and advertising their services. He currently employs 22 painters and pays them $10.50 per hour for painting and â€Å"prep-work† (scraping old paint, caulking, cleaning and removing bugs from the areas that are to be painted). In order to be profitable, Malachai has learned to provide superior service to his customers, including free price quotes. He builds in his profit-margin of 25% to all quotes by first computing his total costs, then adding 25% of that number to determine how much to charge the customer. Using his knowledge of the expenses for labor, supplies, and equipment, he has developed the following information: b. (5 points) The Marks family needs to get the outside of their house painted, including the siding as well as the white trim. Malachai estimates that area of the exterior of the house is about 8,000 square feet. Based on the condition of the Marks’ house he also estimates that he will need 2 workers for 8 hours to do the prep-work. How much should Malachai quote for the cost of this job, including labor, supplies, and profit? c. (5 points) Write a formula reflecting the price estimate for a house based on the number of square feet that need to be painted. Assume that Malachai can accurately estimate the painted area (in square feet) and the amount of time it takes to complete the prep-work on a job. d. (10 points) What do you think? Using the evidence from above, explain in a well-structured essay the importance of accurate cost estimates in a service-oriented business such as this. Research at least one other service-oriented business such as a restaurant, dry-cleaners, house-cleaning service and describe how they set

Robin Hood Case Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Robin Hood Case - Assignment Example This ensures that Robin is always can always plan ahead of the Sheriff and each of the Sheriff’s moves will be reactionary. Robin Hood’s key problem is that of infinite resources within Sherwood Forest as a result of change of route by the more wealthy travellers. Following what currently is in place is not sustainable as the lack of resources including insufficient rations will continue to bite and the group will eventually disintegrate. The two characters need a new plan which will uplift their current situation and ensure that they remain true to their pursuit of justice ideals. Applying a uniform tax to all travellers as suggested by Robin Hood will work to ensure that the group loses its key support base of the farmers and the poor. Robin’s last proposition seems to make much more sense in light of the current situation. What is logical is to partner with the rich barons who have the ability and resources to sustain the Merrymen and in exchange, Robin takes up the political course to free King Richard. This is definitely a bad idea as the exercise will now target Robin’s key support base of the poor and the farmers. This is a common pitfall for even established organizations who after sometime start to take for granted their key customers. A similar scenario is replicated when Robin opts to attack his main stay of political support – the poor travellers and famers. The pros of accepting this offer includes the fact that Robin will now have more resources for the welfare of the Merrymen. Another pro emerges in the coalition that will be formed as a result of this cooperation. A working relationship between Robin and the Barons will isolate the Sheriff and Prince John. The cons include the possible loss of focus as now Robin will be forced to concentrate on two concurrent causes, one against the Sheriff and the other directed towards liberating King Richard. Association with the